Good news: You just closed Series B. The board wants aggressive growth. Your mandate: scale from 12 to 30 salespeople in 12 months. Double the revenue. Expand into new territories. You’re excited but terrified.


Good news: You just closed Series B. The board wants aggressive growth. Your mandate: scale from 12 to 30 salespeople in 12 months. Double the revenue. Expand into new territories. You’re excited but terrified.
The stakes are brutal: Every bad hire delays scaling by 6-9 months. At $150K per rep, your hiring budget is $2.7M. If your hit rate is 60% (typical under rapid scaling), you’ll waste $1M+ on mistakes and miss your growth targets.
When hiring velocity increases, quality inevitably suffers. Research across 200+ scaling companies shows:
Manager desperation factor — Low
Manager desperation factor — Very High
Seats need filling fast → managers lower standards → “warm body” hires
18 hires = 90+ interviews → quality of assessment declines
Multiple hiring managers apply different criteria → randomness
No time for culture fit assessment → wrong DNA floods the team
Managers try to replicate top performers without understanding transferable traits
What works in Boston doesn’t predict success in Austin without role calibration
Instead of each manager using different criteria, OMG assessments provide:
Traditional hiring: 6 weeks per hire (4-5 interview rounds, reference checks, debates)
OMG-enabled hiring:
Result: 3-week hiring cycle with higher quality than 6-week traditional process.
When the seat is empty and pipeline is suffering, managers feel pressure to hire whoever seems decent. OMG assessments create objective circuit-breaker:
“This candidate is NOT RECOMMENDED. Major DNA issues: High Need for Approval, Weak Handling of Rejection, Non-Supportive Buy Cycle. They will struggle in this role.”
Hard to ignore data-driven recommendation when desperation kicks in.
Managers often say “Find me another Sarah” (your top performer). But they want Sarah’s results, not necessarily herexact profile.
OMG reveals:
For your next hire, you want Sarah’s strengths (Hunting, Consultative Selling, Extrinsic drive) WITHOUT her weaknesses (Need for Approval, Closing gaps).
Assessment-based hiring enables smart cloning.
Cultural fit assessment reveals:
Prevents “mercenary” hires who hit numbers but poison culture.
Company: Scaling from 15 to 45 reps
Break-even: At just 8 assessments, subscription pays for itself. Most scaling companies use 30-50 assessments (saving$10K-20K).
Or scale fast with objective assessments that maintain 78% success rate while moving just as quickly.